Re: Problems printing Palladium

John Rudiak (wizard@laplaza.taos.nm.us)
Thu, 29 Feb 1996 19:48:54 -0700 (MST)

On Fri, 1 Mar 1996, Steve Avery wrote:

>
> ------- Forwarded Message
>
> Date: 27 Feb 1996 07:52:07 GMT
> From: "ODSRARN5.ASTRAUS" <ASTRAUS@odsrarn5.ssw.jnj.com>
> Subject: Problems printing Palladium
> To: alt-photo-process@vast.unsw.edu.au
>
>
> I have recently started printing in palladium and have a problem that I need
> some advice on.
>
> An ordinary (suitable for silver) negative prints nicely but flat, so I have
> made a contrasty negative
> at the recommended density of around 2.1 for highlights, 1.2 for mid-tones.
> If I expose this negative for
> an adequate time to get some detail in the highlights I grossly overexpose
> the shadows. I get what I have
> heard referred to as "bronzing". Can anyone suggest a way to avoid this??
>
> Also. I have tried mixing palladium 50/50 with platinum, and I do not see
> any difference between this and
> pure palladium. The color, D-max and tonal range appear to be the same. I
> developed the images in
> fresh ammonia citrate to insure that palladium deposits wouldnt influence
> the color. What should I expect??
>
> Al Strauss
>
>
>
>
> ------- End of Forwarded Message
>
The higher the percentage of palladium, the more prone the shadows are
towards reversal. Why don't you try for a highlight (zone 9) density of
around 1.8. Also paper choice makes a difference, as does developer.
Could you provide more details on your working procedures?

Thanks