Re: Gum prints with the enlarger

Michael Rainey (jasmine2@omni.cc.purdue.edu)
Fri, 19 Apr 1996 06:51:58 -0500 (EST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Mike Ware: "Re: Gum prints with the enlarger"
Previous message: Pekka Nikrus: "digital negatives for cyanotype"
In reply to: Risa S. Horowitz: "Re: Gum prints with the enlarger"
Next in thread: Mike Ware: "Re: Gum prints with the enlarger"

Think about this...pigment is pigment, gum arabic is gum arabic, and then
sensitizers have various properties....one of which is relative
sensitivity to light, making some contact speed, some not, etc.

I'm sure this "new and improved" technique would guarantee "success".

New clothes nor new old clothes do not make a new person! (Thoreau).

Next message: Mike Ware: "Re: Gum prints with the enlarger"
Previous message: Pekka Nikrus: "digital negatives for cyanotype"
In reply to: Risa S. Horowitz: "Re: Gum prints with the enlarger"
Next in thread: Mike Ware: "Re: Gum prints with the enlarger"