Re: a propos of a propos
Peter charles fredrick (pete@fotem.demon.co.uk)
Wed, 15 May 96 11:33:47 +1000
>>
>> I'm sorry I was so cranky. I like the list quite a bit and have
>> learned a tremendous amount of new techniques.
>>
>>Cynthia,
>
>You should not have to apoligize for anything. Your original message
>was short and would have taken about 1/20th of a second to delete for
>anyone not interested in responding, either because of nothing to
>contribute to the discussion, or because your question was deemed to
>be too simplistic. It certainly cost me no time or money.
>
>On the other hand, the rejoinder by Klaus and subsequent responses
>(including, helas, this one, have occupied quite a bit of band width.
>Perhaps he (and I) are the ones to apologize for getting off topic.
>
>This newsgroup is one of the richest sources of information (sorry,
>th richest) in the world on the alternative processes. One ought to be
>able to afford a little down-loading cost without complaint.
>
>Sandy King
>Sanking@hubcap.clemson.edu
>
>
Well said sandy, lets not get our knickers in a knot over nothing, give the
kids a chance, and be friendly.they are our future.
pete