Re: physiology vs. sensitometry

Pollmeier Klaus (100561.2417@CompuServe.COM)
09 Jun 96 05:41:36 EDT

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Pollmeier Klaus: "Re: Re: The Assignment of Qualities to..."
Previous message: Peter Marshall: "Re: physiology vs. sensitometry"
Maybe in reply to: TERRY KING: "physiology vs. sensitometry"
Next in thread: Pollmeier Klaus: "Re: physiology vs. sensitometry"

Thank you Eugene Robkin for correcting the dB definition and clarifying the
Weber-Fechner law. I was referring to the energy in my statement and used the
wrong term.

Klaus Pollmeier

Next message: Pollmeier Klaus: "Re: Re: The Assignment of Qualities to..."
Previous message: Peter Marshall: "Re: physiology vs. sensitometry"
Maybe in reply to: TERRY KING: "physiology vs. sensitometry"
Next in thread: Pollmeier Klaus: "Re: physiology vs. sensitometry"