From: TERRY KING, 101522,2625
TO: Peter Marshall, INTERNET:petermarshall@cix.compulink.co.uk
DATE: 09/06/96 18:11
RE: Copy of: Re: physiology vs. sensitometry
Peter
The negatives produced would be more like the ones that Terry
> prefers (or thinks superior) for platinum
There is no doubt that they produce superior results !
Grain and sharpness were hardly of importance - and very dense negs
> were no great problem. Once enlargement became important photographers needed
to rethink their
> methods
Why ?
and aim for lower density, less grainy and sharper negs - and so
> the need for the Zone system.
Is not that just what we have been saying ?
It was _not_ a response to any problems of
> silver gelatine printing paper
> results.
So why all the agony ?
Terry