Digital negative curve update

Beakman (beakman@netcom.com)
Wed, 31 Jul 1996 07:27:35 -0700 (PDT)

Yesterday I reported some possible Photoshop compensation curves for
platinum and palladium. The data for those curves was gleaned from a
digital step tablet made by Evercolor which seems to print quite well on
Crane's Platinotype paper sensitized with palladium and developed in
ammonium citrate. It also seemed to be reasonably close to the mark (a
little fine tuning required) for a 1:7 mix of Pt/Pd, double-coated,
printed on Arches Platine, and developed in potassium oxalate #2 (1 drop
of sodium dichromate solution add per 200ml of developer).

Also, this negtaive printed well on Fabriano, but requires less
correction than was applied to the negative. I derived and reported a
possible curve to be used with the Fabriano paper (again, 1:7 Pt/Pd,
double-coated and developed in potassium oxalate #2).

I have not tried the reported curve on a print yet -- I will report those
results in a couple of weeks. Charlie Palmer, who contributes here, may
have some results to report even sooner than that. The point is that
this curve is still EXPERIMENTAL, and should be taken as such.

After entering the curves in the Photoshop curves dialog box, I noted
some irregularities in the curve, which I have smoothed out to make a
nice sweeping curve. I am including here the values of the adjusted
curve. I will be testing this curve within the next couple of weeks, and
will report back.

Input % Output % for Platine Output% for Fabriano
_________ ____________________ ____________________

100 90 90
95 70 75
90 47 60
85 36 49 (84% input=49% output)
80 30 42
75 25 35
70 21 30
65 18 26
60 15 22
55 12 18
50 10 16
45 8 14 (46% input=14% output)
40 7 12 (41% input=12% output)
35 5 10 (33% input=10% output)
30 4 -
25 - -
20 - 4
15 - -
10 - -
5 - -
0 1 1

If anyone tries these curves, please report your results.

good luck!

David Fokos