Re: Processing 4x5 sheet film

Greg Schmitz (gws1@columbia.edu)
Thu, 1 Aug 1996 15:12:26 -0400 (EDT)

On Wed, 31 Jul 1996, Judy Seigel wrote regarding Kodak Pro Copy film:

> As I told Luis, rather tartly perhaps (at least for me who is generally so
> sweet), I was well aware of that and had bracketed the film from here to
> Gibraltar. The overall density range was fine, and the highlights were in
> fact dandy. But I'd included a grey scale on the copyboard (I too was
> using the film for copying) and was trying to match the *midtones* which
> simply would not match tone for tone until I switched to Rodinal.
>
> (A friend, whom I shall refer to here only as GS, put me up to this. His
> PCF came out perfect every time, but he was flipping 8 in a tray, which
> turned out not to be my best trick.)

I would note here, as a warning, to anyone who is considering using
Kodak Professional Copy (4125) for critical applications that it does
not age well. Pay close attention to the expiration date on the box
and keep it in the fridge/freezer. I spent several days pulling my
hair out with an outdated box trying to get it to perform properly. A
fresh box solved the problem immediately. It does not pay to be penny
wise and pound foolish with this film - just a little friendly advice.

-greg schmitz

>===for PGP Key finger Greg Schmitz <gws1@cunix.cc.columbia.edu>===
:: ::
Key fingerprint = 73 D3 91 15 96 69 74 E5 14 51 71 44 C8 ED 01 11
Key ID: A7026B1D Key Size: 1024 bits Created: 1994/11/10
==================================================================<