Re: Alternative

Judy Seigel (jseigel@panix.com)
Fri, 20 Sep 1996 10:00:02 -0400 (EDT)

On Fri, 20 Sep 1996, rosebud wrote:
> Amen. I thought I was going to vomit if "full disclosure" was mentioned
> just one more time. I gave up long before the last biased gasps were
> exhausted.

Hey Darryl, want to start an argument about "vintage" versus contemporary
prints? Another lotta nonsense, but it gets into big bucks. I've heard
several dealers & photographers (even David Vestal) explain how much
*better* later prints are. Or how the photographer him or herself wasn't
such a good printer to begin with... The consensus is "so what"? Vintage
sells for more, sometimes lots more.

Cheers,

Judy