Re: Imaging

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Next message: Beakman: "Re: Imaging"
Previous message: Beakman: "Re: Imaging"
In reply to: Beakman: "Re: Imaging"

Judy Seigel (jseigel@panix.com)
Fri, 20 Sep 1996 20:25:52 -0400 (EDT)

On Sat, 21 Sep 1996, Beakman wrote:
> 9. Getting a 16x20 enlarged digital neg is probably cheaper than getting
> an analog one.

OK, David -- let's hear it on that one......

Judy