Re: Pyro (reply)

Hamish.Sophie (Hamish.Sophie@wanadoo.fr)
Mon, 26 Jan 1998 18:33:18 +0100

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: tcekolin@rd.qms.com: "plaser material from freestyle"
Previous message: Tom Ferguson: "Re: T-Max 400 / Tri-X revisited"

>Subject: Re: Pyro
>Sent: 23/1/98 1:55
>Received: 23/1/98 16:28
>From: Larry Bullis, lbullis@ctc.ctc.edu
>To: Alt Photo Process List, alt-photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca
>
>>My own personal feeling is that TRI-X
>>seems to respond better to pushing and pulling for contrast control than
>>TMAX.
I would concur in that I find Tri-X more suited to
compression/contraction than T-Max. I have used Rodinal for about 10
years with Tri-X at both 1:50 and 1:75 dilutions and am delighted with
the results. Tri-X has a personality with Rodinal that I just feel
comfortable with. Yes I can get less grain with T-Max but I just prefer
how my images look that are processed in Rodinal

Next message: tcekolin@rd.qms.com: "plaser material from freestyle"
Previous message: Tom Ferguson: "Re: T-Max 400 / Tri-X revisited"