Why is it not possible for some participants in this forum to refrain from
negativity and name calling that provides practically no constructive
information? The intent of this forum, as I understand it is to share
information relating to Alternate photo processes. When the thread becomes
muddled with personal tirade it only detracts from its usefulness. However,
I am sure that we all have something to contribute that IS useful and so I
continue to read on, wishing, hoping, dreaming.
Maybe some day.....
Hal
-----Original Message-----
From: Valburg <lkv1@psu.edu>
To: alt-photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca
<alt-photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca>
Date: Thursday, March 19, 1998 7:42 PM
Subject: Re: dye sublimation prints
>Mr. Maxey,
>
>Perhaps you could pause in your chest-pounding long enough to follow your
>own advice and refrain from "making statements which are not proven" ("This
>is simply a fact"..."pure crap from Strand and Penn"...."there have NEVER
>been any tests that can be repeatable or conclusive"). If Mr. Wilhelms
>work is flawed and is being debunked by "better experts," I'm certain many
>readers of this list would like to know of it, and to be able investigate
>for themselves. You would support your arguments much more persuasively by
>offering names and sources than by beating us over the head with your
>hyperbole and unsupported assertions of Truth. If we are to believe you
>rather than Mr. Wilhelm, whose work and methods are published and easily
>accessible, you'll have do more than simply insist that you know better.
>
>Sincerely,
>Mitch Valburg
>