[Fwd: Means to an end..... -Forwarded -Forwarded]

Michael Silver (mikesilver@mindless.com)
Sat, 21 Mar 1998 21:39:12 -0500

Date: Sat, 21 Mar 1998 21:33:08 -0500
From: Michael Silver <mikesilver@mindless.com>
Subject: Re: Means to an end..... -Forwarded -Forwarded
To: John Rudiak <wizard@laplaza.org>
Message-id: <35147864.B5A0F7E@mindless.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (Win95; I)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
References: <072565CE.000BD0B6.00@usslcsmtp.mhz.com>
<35136270.DC03DE63@mindless.com> <351453E0.23E7@laplaza.org>

Masonite is preferred by conservators. You can read about it in Ralph
Mayers "Artist Handbook" It must be sized with acrylic or better yet
rabbit skin glue to prevent migration. The weakness of medieval panels
was the panel - usually oak. As it moves with temperature changes the
gesso cracks. Masonite is very stable and like the 1 billion Barbie
Dolls sold will last many many of our lifetimes. Pure fired ceramic is
even better but of course they can break.

Art lasting is not one of my concerns. But our need to want them to last
is.
Mike S

John Rudiak wrote:
>
> Michael Silver wrote:
> >
> > RE: Permanence.
> > The limiting factor of a platinum print is the paper. As a result I have
> > been experimenting with printing on China Clay Gessoed Masonite. If
> > medieval panels are any indication these should not just last but stay
> > fresh for at least 1000 years.
> > Mike Silver
> >
>
> It sure seems you could have chosen something better than masonite.
>
> John