Re: lights

John Rudiak (wizard@laplaza.org)
Thu, 14 May 1998 18:28:07 -0600

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Greg Schmitz: "Re: Non-Terry et'al comments (fwd)"
Previous message: terryroth@earthlink.net: "Re: Non-Terry et'al comments (fwd)"
Maybe in reply to: Eric Neilsen: "lights"
Next in thread: John Rudiak: "Re: lights"

terryroth@earthlink.net wrote:
>
> why the image is still formed, though the intensity of the light is
> diminished. I have no idea why the contrast is different, perhaps one
> of the expers on the list will explain.
>
> --Ter

It is most probably due to reciprocity effects.

John

-- 
Alchemy Printmaking & Photography
PO Box 633 Ranchos de Taos, NM   87557
http://www.quetzl.com/Alchemy/html.index

Next message: Greg Schmitz: "Re: Non-Terry et'al comments (fwd)"
Previous message: terryroth@earthlink.net: "Re: Non-Terry et'al comments (fwd)"
Maybe in reply to: Eric Neilsen: "lights"
Next in thread: John Rudiak: "Re: lights"