Re: Continuous Tone? (was Re: Pt/Pd vs Gum???)

Steve Shapiro (sgshiya@redshift.com)
Tue, 12 Jan 1999 12:47:07 -0800

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: Wayde Allen: "Re: Pt/Pd vs Gum???"
• Previous message: Jeffrey D. Mathias: "Re: platinum on glass and Bee Velum"
• In reply to: kl: "platinum on glass"
• Next in thread: Steve Shapiro: "Re: Continuous Tone? (was Re: Pt/Pd vs Gum???)"

Subject: Re: Continuous Tone? (was Re: Pt/Pd vs Gum???)

>> > But don't ever even think that silver negs are true "continuous tone."
>>
>
Dave wrote --
>On the strictest sense, it is true that they are not "true continuous
tone,"

In the strictest sense, what is continuous tone? I have wondered about this
since I was in Cub Scouts.

SS.

• Next message: Wayde Allen: "Re: Pt/Pd vs Gum???"
• Previous message: Jeffrey D. Mathias: "Re: platinum on glass and Bee Velum"
• In reply to: kl: "platinum on glass"
• Next in thread: Steve Shapiro: "Re: Continuous Tone? (was Re: Pt/Pd vs Gum???)"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sat Nov 06 1999 - 10:06:41