Michael Keller (keller@wvinter.net)
Tue, 12 Jan 1999 21:59:21 -0500
It depends partly on the end product desired. If your final intended result is
a 133line screen color page in Vanity Fair, then a high end digital system may
be good enough. If you want 16x20 photographic prints, then no. Again, the best
tool for the job. The AP photographers apparently love, and can make proper use
of, their digital SLRs.
Bob_Maxey@mtn.3com.com wrote:
> It does not matter the content or subject, for what I was referring to was
> the comparison between film and digital techniques. It is a simple fact
> that digital can't compare to film, period. Film is far sharper and fine
> grained than any digital process. Not to mention the problem of longevity.
> Output from digital printers can't be guaranteed to last the same length of
> time as my Kodachromes.
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sat Nov 06 1999 - 10:06:41