Judy Seigel (jseigel@panix.com)
Sat, 23 Jan 1999 14:21:08 -0500 (EST)
On Sat, 23 Jan 1999, Carl Weese wrote:
> I can't think of any reason why properly made enlarged negatives
> shouldn't print approximately the same--in terms of formula and printing
> time---as in-camera negatives.
I can think of 2, although they may not be overriding...
The film base plus fog on the lith film is VERY low, but can go
rather high on camera film.
The thickness of the film itself could also count, lith being .03 or
at most .04 (if I have the decimal in the right place), the others
generally around .07, which could be more than twice as thick.
Judy
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sat Nov 06 1999 - 10:06:44