Re: tri-x and bpf 200


Carl Weese (cjweese@wtco.net)
Fri, 22 Jan 1999 16:15:40 -0500


Oh, I missed the other part of your message--yes, not needing a filter
is potentially helpful for depth of field or motion freezing. In a
situation where I might want to maintain delicate detail in a sky filled
with whispy cloud patterns, BPF 200 becomes effectively as fast as TXT
because I have to use a filter on TX, losing a stop of speed.---Carl



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sat Nov 06 1999 - 10:06:46