Re: Tween 20 versus Triton X-100

Cor Breukel (cor@ruly46.medfac.leidenuniv.nl)
Wed, 27 Jan 1999 17:28:18 +0100 (MET)

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: Richard Sullivan: "Re: Tween 20 versus Triton X-100"
• Previous message: Richard Sullivan: "Re: Tween 20 versus Triton X-100"
• In reply to: Dr. Christian Wolf: "Tween 20 versus Triton X-100"
• Next in thread: Richard Sullivan: "Re: Tween 20 versus Triton X-100"

On Wed, 27 Jan 1999, Richard Sullivan wrote:

> with the use of Tween. One is that it grows mold after a while. I'd like
> to find a good substitute for Tween.

..as mentioned before by me; take a look at NP40

Cor

• Next message: Richard Sullivan: "Re: Tween 20 versus Triton X-100"
• Previous message: Richard Sullivan: "Re: Tween 20 versus Triton X-100"
• In reply to: Dr. Christian Wolf: "Tween 20 versus Triton X-100"
• Next in thread: Richard Sullivan: "Re: Tween 20 versus Triton X-100"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sat Nov 06 1999 - 10:06:47