AW: Tween 20 versus Triton X-100


Dr. Christian Wolf (chris.wolf@univie.ac.at)
Wed, 27 Jan 1999 18:18:00 +0100


Hi Cor,

thank you for your quick help! To give you a short overview of the scenario: I am new in the field of platinum/palladium printing. I did the first test with Arches Aquarell paper and -surprisingly - it was not too bad. But I have the feeling that the coating could be better with the use of a surfactant. As far as I am informed one can also expect an increase in Dmax (and a lot of problems as well). I asked our chemists ( I am working at the University Hospital of Vienna / Occup. Med. Dep) and they gave me Triton X-100 which they don´t need anymore. Unfortunately I am a physician which means that I don´t understand chemistry at all. So I appreciate your help very much and will start with NP20.

Do you apply a surfactant???

Best regards

Christian

Univ.Prof. Dr. Christian Wolf
Klinische Abteilung Arbeitsmedizin
Waehringer Guertel 18-20
A-1090 Wien
TEL: +43-1-40400-4701
FAX: +43-1-4088011

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Cor Breukel [SMTP:cor@ruly46.medfac.leidenuniv.nl]
Gesendet am: Mittwoch, 27. Jänner 1999 17:28
An: alt-photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca
Betreff: Re: Tween 20 versus Triton X-100

On Wed, 27 Jan 1999, Richard Sullivan wrote:

> with the use of Tween. One is that it grows mold after a while. I'd like
> to find a good substitute for Tween.

.as mentioned before by me; take a look at NP40

Cor




This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sat Nov 06 1999 - 10:06:47