Re: archival ink for deskjet


Richard Lahrson (tripspud@hooked.net)
Fri, 29 Jan 1999 18:47:34 -0800


After all, if this is such a concern, the
> best thing you can do is make separations of your color images and process
> them with care. Then it becomes possible to recreate the color image if
> needed.
> RM

Hi!

     One of the qualities of Technical movies was the possibility of it
being archival. The reality was that the film support had somehow changed
size, making the sepatations not exactly match.

     Making three black and white separation negatives from color
materials is a lot of work. In reality, do many photographers do this?
Equally, recreating the color image from the black and white sepatations
is a lot of work.

     And what process will you use? Kodak discontinued Dye Transfer.
Carbro (three color carbon print) is a very difficult process. Perhaps
others on this list could tell what they use?

     Is it not interesting that the situation with the "image file" on
the computer is similar to the time that the photographic negative became
widely used. Many prints could be made from the same negative! Now,
many prints can be made from the "image file".

                                        Rich Lahrson
                                        tripspud@hooked.net



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sat Nov 06 1999 - 10:06:48