Re: Quasi "alt" question re:8x10 cameras


Steve Shapiro (sgshiya@redshift.com)
Mon, 01 Feb 1999 17:09:55 -0800


I wish to add that the Kodak #2 I spok of does NOT have tilt fronts. But,
the rear does move side, swing, tilt; and the front rises. With some
hardward, now available, a full movement could be made with this Kodak #2.

It is on E-bay and may well still be available after the subscription
expires.

I spoke, thinking of another camera at that shop that is not for sale.

The question came up on the pinhole list as to what would be available for
pinhole work with a bellows.

I would still stand behind this camera, at $500.

Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: PMpainter@aol.com <PMpainter@aol.com>
To: alt-photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca
<alt-photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca>
Date: Monday, February 01, 1999 9:08 AM
Subject: Re: Quasi "alt" question re:8x10 cameras

>I have just puchased one of the cheap dabbler cameras without front tilt or
>swing but I think it is a good starting point and very affordable. Say $300
>for the complete outfit and you have it right.
>
>I suggest you try www.Ebay.com and look under large format photo equipment.
>That's where I got mine and if you have $600 or so you can usually find a
nice
>Deardorf.
>
>Good Luck,
>
>Paul
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sat Nov 06 1999 - 10:06:49