Steve Shapiro (sgshiya@redshift.com)
Mon, 01 Feb 1999 19:19:21 -0800
To your knowledge, Sil, when the Formulary description for FX-2 talks about
''internal effects," and "less acuatence" than FX-1, what is it they refer
to, in terms of results perceived on the print and in the negative?
Their descriptions of the two developer formulas include fine grain and high
acuatence for both.
Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: Sil Horwitz <silh@iag.net>
To: alt-photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca
<alt-photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca>
Date: Monday, February 01, 1999 6:43 PM
Subject: Re: Glycin
>At 07:12 PM 1999/02/01 -0700, John Rudiak wrote:
>>
>>Steve Shapiro wrote:
>>
>>> Subject: Re: Glycin
>>>
>>> If that's what glycin is, maybe we should stick to Rodinal for a
developer.
>>
>>For those who might not know, p-aminophenol is the developing agent unique
>(to
>>my knowledge) to Rodinal.
>
>And p-aminophenol is an apple, and glycin is an orange. Very different in
>processing, not comparable at all. Many developers are substituted
>p-aminophenols, such as Metol, which is a monomethyl-p-aminophenol (sulfate
>- which just makes it more soluble), likewise different.
>
>Sil Horwitz, FPSA
>Technical Editor, PSA Journal
>silh@iag.net
>Visit http://www.psa-photo.org/
>Personal page: http://www.iag.net/~silh/
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sat Nov 06 1999 - 10:06:49