Re: chrysotypie


Steve Shapiro (sgshiya@redshift.com)
Tue, 16 Feb 1999 15:32:30 -0800


Why do we go into such technical detail without any aesthetic descriptions?

What are the chemicals and the process step by step to make these, um,
chrysotypes?

SS
-----Original Message-----
From: Don Bryant <dsbryant@worldnet.att.net>
To: alt-photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca
<alt-photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca>
Date: Tuesday, February 16, 1999 2:32 PM
Subject: Re: chrysotypie

>It is my understanding that Ed Buziak is off line at CompuServe and the
>Internet due to a severe lighting strike at his home/office. Apparently
this
>isn't the first time Ed's computer equipment has been hit by lighting, if
>you can believe such reports.
>
>If you are subscribing for Alt. Process information I wouldn't bother as
the
>magazine of late has been only marginal in content for Alt Process
material.
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: garimo <omirag@cruzio.com>
>To: <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>;
<alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
>Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 1999 4:34 PM
>Subject: Re: chrysotypie
>
>
>>>
>>>For obvious reasons, I cannot give you the script of the article prior to
>>>publication but if you wish to subscribe to the magazine (for a year) you
>>>could do so by contacting:-
>>>
>>> Ed Buziak on ......Ed Buziak <100410.1561@compuserve.com>
>>>
>>>Of course, if you contact me again after the publication date I may be
>able
>>>to supply you with further details of this technique, but I can assure
you
>>>that the magazine is well worth the modest subscription!
>>>
>>> Best wishes...Tony McLean.
>>
>>Hi Tony,
>> I wrote to the above email address and asked about subscriptions, (on
>>Feb.10th.) like you said in a post to me. As of today, I have gotten no
>>reply. Maybe you have the URL of the magazine??
>>thanks,
>>garimo
>>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sat Nov 06 1999 - 10:06:51