Re: Digital prints


Judy Seigel (jseigel@panix.com)
Tue, 20 Apr 1999 01:47:09 -0400 (EDT)


On Mon, 19 Apr 1999, Jonathan C Hall wrote:
>
> I would like to hear comments to refute my thinking and information on
> anything that lasts longer than 35 years. However I want irrefutable proof
> that they last longer.
> Otherwise I will have to wait till something comes down the pike that meets
> the specific criteria to be labeled archival.
>
> If I want one of my images to become archival I photograph it and print with
> the correct media.

I agree, pretty much... There's been a lumping together in this discussion
of digital negatives and digital prints, but generalities about one don't
apply to the other, necessarily, probably.

J.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu Oct 28 1999 - 21:39:32