Peter Marshall (petermarshall@cix.co.uk)
Sat, 22 May 1999 13:19 +0100 (BST)
> FX-2 was not available in the late 1800's, and Atget certainly would not
> have fooled around with it. Crawley's FX formulas were created in the 
> mid
> 1900's and published in the British Journal as well as the BJ
> Annuals.
Just to add a little to what Sil says. Crawley was for quite a long time 
Editor of the BJP and still contributes regularly (I think he is described 
as Technical Editor) mainly reviews of equipment and materials which are 
notable for their thoroughness and practical testing - not just the 
re-hashes of press packs that appear in so many publications. 
His formulae are still published in the annual BJP 'The Big Book' which is 
an essential reference for UK professional photographers, listing studios, 
repairers, organisations, agencies etc.
The current edition includes his FX-1,1b,2,4,5,5b,11,15,19 and FX 37 
formulae for b/w film along with other formulae including film and print 
developers, fixers and toners (there is also a colour section). 
Paterson market a number of his developers (they are available in the USA 
as well) which I think generally have similar properties to the published 
formulae but are all solutions generally used 1+9 or so, using added 
components (alcohols?) to increase the solubility. The most interesting of 
these to me is FX39 as this is specially formulated to get the best 
results with TMax and Delta films. I tested this against T-Max, D76 and 
Xtol for TMax 100 film and was amazed by its clearly superior sharpness 
and also smoother grain. Although there wasn't any real difference in 
grain size - it isn't a fine-grain developer-  when I looked at high 
degrees of enlargement so that the grain could clearly be seen the FX39 
seemed to give less 'noise'. It also lets you rate the film at its ISO 
speed or even slightly above.
FX37 (and I think I've posted the formula here before, but will dig it out 
again if it isn't in the archive and anyone requests it) is I think a very 
similar formula but for use at 1+3 only, but I haven't tried it. 
Peter Marshall
_________________________________________________________________
London's Industrial Heritage: http://www.cix.co.uk/~petermarshall
The Buildings of London etc: http://www.spelthorne.ac.uk/pm/
Also on Fixing Shadows: http://www.people.virginia.edu/~ds8s
and elsewhere......
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu Oct 28 1999 - 21:39:34