Kurt Tomcala (camera@primenet.com)
Thu, 22 Jul 1999 10:38:53 -0700
As far as keeping ones negatives? I think that is something each individual
deals with on a personal level. What is wrong with destroying negatives? It
is not the print I made from it? Does anyone have Van Gogh paints ?
brushes? What brand paint did he use? Oh he made his own,,,from what
pigments?Does anyone even know of what ones he used or the time of day that
he made this image? It amazes me that in Photographic Images it seems
everyone wants to know the time, materials, and everything that materially
went into the image. What film did you use, developer, tray or tank, or
maybe rotary processor? What paper is that, developer and so on and on and
on. The point is who needs or cares what material things were used to create
an image. The only thing that counts is what is felt inside of you when you
create it and when it is viewed by others.
Just a personal view :)
Kurt
Kurt Tomcala
13602 North 44th Street
Apt 120
Phoenix, AZ 85032
602.485.9670
camera@primenet.com
http://www.primenet.com/~camera/
-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Kiss <bobkiss@caribsurf.com>
To: ALT PHO PROC. <alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca>
Date: Thursday, July 22, 1999 10:26 AM
Subject: RE: RE: RE:
>DEAR RICHARD,
> Yes, I know that New York requires galleries to give a disclosure
>statement (or did in1993 when I moved out) with each print sale.
>PLEASE NEVER DESTROY NEGATIVES: They are historical documents and many will
>be of social and cultural significance that we cannot imagine. It won't
hurt
>having around those which are not significant as a price to pay to preserve
>those that are but only posterity can judge...not us... so keep them safe.
> There is a standard procedure for all of this. The negative(s) are
>retired to a vault for 100 years, I believe as a lawyers escrow arrangement
>(Not certain of this part) when the edition is finished.
>I feel certain that, except for those on Mount Olympus, none of us will be
>around to make any more prints OF OUR OWN NEGATIVES! These are the vintage
>prints. If a museum or anyone else makes many new prints, they only serve
>to INCREASE THE FAME AND VALUE OF THE ORIGINAL, VINTAGE, LIMITED EDITION
>PRINTS made, signed, and numbered, by the hand of the original
>photographer! They do not dilute the value of the originals...they ENHANCE
>it. This has been proven repeatedly. And the negatives are still there for
>historical, educational, and cultural research.
>
> CHEERS!
> BOB KISS
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu Oct 28 1999 - 21:40:37