From: James Romeo (jromeo@iopener.net)
Date: 06/22/00-06:45:00 PM Z
Does eny one know what this is? The email went though. I do not understand this.
James
----- Original Message -----
From: listmanager@sirius.secureforum.com
To: jromeo@iopener.net
Subject: Delivery failure
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2000 18:16:25 PST
Your message has encountered delivery problems to smtp.secureforum.com.
Invalid addressee (To:) format: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Received: From skyway.usask.ca by WEBBOARD-SMTP Thu, 22 Jun, 2000 at 17:18:44
Received: from process.sask.usask.ca by sask.usask.ca (PMDF V5.2-32 #39033)
id <01JQWVL7K1O08ZG34L@sask.usask.ca> (original mail from jromeo@iopener.net)
for AltList@sirius.secureforum.com; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 18:16:41 CST
Received: from CONVERSION-DAEMON by sask.usask.ca (PMDF V5.2-32 #39033)
id <01JQWVL7DJ5C8ZFV7U@sask.usask.ca> for
alt-photo-process-l-expand@process.sask.usask.ca
(ORCPT rfc822;alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca); Thu,
22 Jun 2000 18:16:26 -0600 (CST)
Received: from mta1.iopener.net ([216.140.180.39])
by sask.usask.ca (PMDF V5.2-32 #39033)
with ESMTP id <01JQWVL5MAQC8ZG0AM@sask.usask.ca> for
alt-photo-process-l-expand@process.sask.usask.ca
(ORCPT rfc822;alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca); Thu,
22 Jun 2000 18:16:26 -0600 (CST)
Received: from [4.4.222.98] by mta1.iopener.net
(InterMail vK.4.01.00.02 201-232-112-103)
with SMTP id <20000623001622.BYAQ27011.mta1@[4.4.222.98]> for
<alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca>; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 19:16:22 -0500
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2000 20:16:19 -0400
From: James Romeo <jromeo@iopener.net>
Subject: Vandyke
To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
Message-id: <t961719379c6@d995001656.iopener.net>
Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
----- Original Message -----
From: jromeo@iopener.net
To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
Subject: Vandyke again, was Re: Salted Paper
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2000 17:24:02 -0400
Hi
Vandyke does not use a developer after exposer you develop it in water. It will bleach in
a strong fix.You must use a weak hypo.
I tone them in a gold toner;
You can see some of mine in www.pinholeformat.com
Take care
James Romeo
----- Original Message -----
From: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
Subject: Vandyke again, was Re: Salted Paper
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2000 16:10:00 -0400
At 11:33 AM -0400 6/22/00, Sil Horwitz wrote:
>You're talking apples and oranges! Salt paper is a silver process,
>while VanDyke is an iron process which just uses silver as the image
>element. Action is totally different - salt paper does not require a
>developer, for example, while VanDyke does. Not having used VanDyke
>for a number of years, I'd have to go run back over my notes.
>Possibly others in the group who are presently using the process can
>comment more fully.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 07/14/00-09:46:45 AM Z CST