[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: BIG

To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
Subject: Re: BIG
From: Pam Niedermayer <pam_pine@cape.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2000 16:46:20 -0500
Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
Organization: Pinehill Softworks Inc.
References: <3.0.6.32.20001006230657.0384ce40@popserv.rz.hu-berlin.de>
Reply-to: pam@pinehill.com
Resent-message-id: <0G210078U2UY14@duke.usask.ca>
Resent-reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca

Thanks, Lukas, that's not exactly tiny, but certainly approachable.

Pam

Lukas Werth wrote:
> 
> At 16:05 06.10.00 -0500, you wrote:
> >How big is it?
> >
> >Pam
> >
> >Judy Seigel wrote:
> >> ... (How big is the Mona Lisa?)
> >>
> >> Judy
> >
...
> 
> 77 x 53 cm
> 
> Lukas

-- 
Pamela G. Niedermayer
Pinehill Softworks Inc.
600 W. 28th St., Suite 103
Austin, TX 78705
512-236-1677
512-236-8143 fax
http://www.pinehill.com

References:
- Re: BIG
  - From: Lukas Werth <lukas.werth@rz.hu-berlin.de>

Prev by Date: Re: BIG
Next by Date: Bigger is better???
Prev by thread: Re: BIG
Next by thread: Re: BIG
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread