RE: Van Dyke & Gum

Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Judy Seigel (jseigel@panix.com)
Date: 12/11/01-10:15:18 PM Z


On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, Keith Gerling wrote:

> of the dichromate. To answer your questions, no I don't use platinum or
> palladium for the CMYK prints, and yes I have tried. Maybe if I ever develop
> a market for these things, I could afford to do that. But it just seems to
> be a shame (and fiscally irresponsible) to cover a large sheet of paper with
> precious metals and then flush all but a pittance down the drain. Besides,
> in the course of making multiple coat gum prints problems with clearing and
> registration, etc. take their toll, causing quite a few to wind up in the
> trash. With kallitype (which I prefer over Van Dyke due to the greater
> control over tone), the loss in these cases can be easily absorbed. There
> doesn't seem to be any true consensus on the permanence issue of kallitype
> and Van Dyke brown.

You could also palladium-tone a kallitype, which makes a good blackish
color... an extra step of course. So palladium tone a VDB, which is 3
steps quicker than a kalli. And if you tell dealer it's a PLATINUM TONED
anything, they'll be delirious.

J.


Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 01/02/02-04:47:33 PM Z CST