From: Judy Seigel (jseigel@panix.com)
Date: 12/01/02-10:07:42 PM Z
On Sun, 1 Dec 2002, Don Bryant wrote:
> If I remember correctly, there is an
> > action floating on the internet that will do a series of upsamplings at
> 1.10%
> > till you get the size you want. I suppose you could test both ways and
> see
> > which seems to work the best.
> >
This came up on the list before, and the general consensus seemed to be
that it's better to go up in steps. Would one (or all) of you mavens
please explain why that's better than going up at once? I'm NOT
doubting, but curious... except puleese, simple if possible, not to
demoralize the digitally deficient.
On 2nd thought, has anyone done a test, that is tried it both ways? (My
hunch would be that, just like everything, it depends... )
Judy
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : 01/31/03-09:31:25 AM Z CST