[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Paper for Oil Printing
I saw these two prints of Richard's at the reception area of B & S. The
reproductions linked in Richard's posting aren't bad -- I mean, they give an
idea. The first one (the vertical of the trees), in particular, is very much
more impressive in person. Beautiful tone and indescribable, sensuous
texture. -jb
Richard Sullivan <richsul@earthlink.net> said:
> A month or two ago I had coated some gelatin 290 Bloom on Stonehenge 240 gm
> paper on my coating machine.
>
> On a lark I decided to sensitize it in 5% ammonium dichromate this was just
> a best guess idea as I was going on memory. I exposed the neg and washed
> the paper for about 5 minutes. I then found an old bromoil brush and some
> Senfelders black litho ink and started pounding away.
>
> That produced the first print of the trees in the snow. Note that these
> were test negs and not anything exceptional as I was experimenting with
> carbon tissue.
>
> This took about an hour of pounding to produce.
>
> The second one was overexposed and it took another hour to ink up. This was
> my first attempt at either an oil or bromoil but I've watched Gene Laughter
> ink prints at APIS.
>
> Both prints are on a page at:
>
> http://www.bostick-sullivan.com/carbon/OildPrints/oil_print.htm
>
>
> No glycerine no fancy schmancy stuff, just gelled paper, dichromated,
> exposed, washed and inked.
>
> The Stoenhenge comes in 50 inch rolls so I cut it down to a 25 inch and can
> run 15 feet lengths now. I've considered making an oil paper for the market
> but thought there might not be much of a market for it. I have the two
> prints in our reception room and people are quite taken by them.
>
> From observation oil prints are more vibrant than bromoil. Gosh they ink
> up nice compared to what I've seen with bromoil.
>
> Bromoil does have the advantage of not needing an enlarged negative but
> from the little experience I've had my recommendation is if you have a
> large neg go with the oil print.
>
> --Dick Sullivan
>
>
>
--