[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mordancage
Maybe I came in late but for us new to Alt. what is mordencage? Obviously I
am fascinated by the possibility of producing a neg or a pos from the same
print. Can you simply discuss why someone would use the mordencage process?
Thanks, Thom
----- Original Message -----
From: "Christina Z. Anderson" <zphoto@montana.net>
To: "Alt Photo List" <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 19:30
Subject: mordancage
> OK, so it's taken months to get back into testing this again but here is
> what I found. This week I tested this and stand development (reported
that
> to the pure silver list). I took two of the exact same print and paper
and
> side by side used the copper sulfate/citric acid/potassium bromide mixture
> next to the Jack Coote formula out of the Ilford book. By far the Jack
> Coote formula is superior.
> First of all, you can mix up the formula and let it sit for months
and
> it keeps on tickin'. (1000 ml water with 30g copper chloride and 80ml
> glacial acetic acid). Just before use, mix it with 20v or 40 v hydrogen
> peroxide, equal vol. It doesn't require heat. It bleaches immediately
and
> immediately eats the emulsion. You can see the emulsion all mushy and
> bubbly in the dark areas. If you want to make the image a negative of the
> positive, you rub the whole print off. If you want to keep it positive,
> don't rub. In both cases, redevelop in Dektol or toner. OR, do a half
> neg/half pos with half rub. The highlights remain mostly unaffected so
will
> continue to be positive. One time thru the bleach and developer is plenty
> enough.
> The other formula did make the emulsion fragile but even with a
> scouring sponge it did not all come off. It was more work than it was
> worth. I think I just need to adopt the adage, "if it ain't broke don't
fix
> it", even if the copper sulfate is cheaper by far than the copper
chloride.
> With Tri-Ess Sciences (thank you, Jonathan Bailey) the copper chloride is
> cheap enough by the pound to not be a huge expense.
> The other thing I noticed, side by side, was the redevelopment in
> normal Dektol brought the image in the Coote formula back to full density,
> but the other image did not come back to full density. This could be a
> fluke, but it would seem that a mordancage of that formula may require a
> darker print. Since i did both prints at exactly the same time, same
> developer, same density, I kind of don't think it was a fluke.
> The copper sulfate/citric acid formula was the one that Peter
Marshall
> found in an old Amateur Photographer magazine. I notice from the number
of
> other formulae I have on mordancage that usually copper sulfate is
combined
> with acetic or nitric acid, and copper chloride with acetic or citric. I
> have about 10 formulae I have come across all told, some I have discarded.
> I have tried to start up convos with people off list about mordancage
> but no replies to those I emailed--they obviously weren't interested in
> sharing trade secrets :) and obviously I don't believe in trade secrets.
> Jimmy Peguet, you did say you took a class from Sudre--if you are willing
to
> correspond, please email me offlist.
> Chris
>
>
- References:
- mordancage
- From: "Christina Z. Anderson" <zphoto@montana.net>