Re: Flatbed scanner transparency adapter?

From: Christina Z. Anderson ^lt;zphoto@montana.net>
Date: 12/20/03-12:17:26 PM Z
Message-id: <001e01c3c725$8680a100$773ead42@oemcomputer>

Hi Mark,
     I'm talking about 20x30 prints from digital files, not negs...the 20x30
prints at the 250 ppi were great, on the Fuji Crystal Archive. Far be it
from me to do 20x30 inch gum negatives at this point :)
Chris
----- Original Message -----
From: <Ender100@aol.com>
To: <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2003 11:50 AM
Subject: Re: Flatbed scanner transparency adapter?

Chris,

If you are doing multi coat gum, the 150 would probably be fine. If you
are
doing PT/PD, then maybe the 300 would suit you better.

Mark Nelson
In a message dated 12/20/03 11:31:00 AM, zphoto@montana.net writes:

> Eric,
> Do you think there is a difference in quality/resolution between the
> 150-300? Because the file size more than triples, and it'd be a lot easier
> to work with a 150 ppi file if I found a company that uses that size.
> Chris
>
Received on Sat Dec 20 12:24:58 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 01/02/04-09:36:33 AM Z CST