From: Christopher Lovenguth (zantzant@hotmail.com)
Date: 01/08/03-12:41:06 PM Z
I find this so interesting that every other month people here seemed quite
confused as to what is art. Why do I only ever see photographers so
preoccupied with this? It is almost like some people here are constantly
searching for ammunition to prove a point of how messed up the art world
that won't accept them is. Sometimes it reminds me of the kid on the block
who wasn’t allowed in the clubhouse. Most artist I know who are not
photographers seem concerned and obsessed with making, NOT if their work is
"legit". This struggle with legitimacy in personal work must be the reason
people on this list keep bringing up this "what is art" hidden within
different topics. The only other thing I could think of for this constant
onslaught would be jealousy of other mediums and/or art concepts that are
more "acceptable" to the art world then their personal work.
With what Jack Brubaker had to say about photography as being "accessible
form of self expression" this is exactly what art is. Art is not about
skills learned or if you can get a perfect platinum print. Art is
self-expression that a viewer can identify with in whatever form. I would
find a student who did what Jack describe as way more advance in their art
abilities then some one who makes a compositionally perfect image and print
that is drab or run of the mill.
-Chris
>Jack Brubaker <jack@jackbrubaker.com> said:
>
> > This is sort of an asside to the issue of "outsider"
> >
> > One of the features common to the several introductory level photo
>classes I
> > have been near over the years is that there was in each one or two
>students
> > who were involved in a very personal self-examination that boardered on
> > painfull and functioned as an undirected therapy for them. Photography
>was a
> > non-verbal way of expressing their fears, concerns, questions, what-ever
> > that didn't require them to learn to draw, mix paint, ar any of the
>other
> > time consuming skills associated with "fine art". As such it was an
> > accessable form of self expression that they used for a while and then
>went
> > away. Their instructors were hestitant to confront them with the content
>of
> > their imagry since most showed resistance to acklnowledging or
>missinturpted
> > the sometimes blatent imagry of their work. This is not "outsider" or
> > "folk" as such but is an area of photography that comes close. It is
>worth
> > remembering for most people photography is not technical or difficult.
>They
> > beleave the Kodak ideal. So the image of the self taught, or un-taught,
> > artist or outsider may well exist within photography and photography may
>in
> > fact be a magnet to those having an eposodic need to express themselves.
> > Just think of all the home computers full of low res. digital images out
> > there. They aren't all pictures of the grandkids.
> >
> > Jack Brubaker
_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : 02/21/03-10:44:16 AM Z CST