From: Stuart W Melvin (swmelvin@earthlink.net)
Date: 07/25/03-10:49:47 AM Z
Katherine,
Even if Livick were the only person to ever, on page in bold black and
white, label pigments "excellent/passable/okay, etc....there are numbers of
people out there who have referred to this information solely. Theses may be
the people who comprise the "much popular opinion" population. There is
opinion out there that is not in print. I have had many people (who have
never written a book) address me on the issue of which pigments are
successful pigments. I would be surprised to here that you have not also.
Pollution (incorrect info) affects not only the stream but the river as
well. It can take a lot of scrubbers to clean it up.
Stuart
-----Original Message-----
From: Katharine Thayer [mailto:kthayer@pacifier.com]
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 2:54 AM
To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
Subject: Re: Gum Pigments
Richard Sullivan wrote:
>
> One thing that Stuart said that goes counter to much popular opinion is
> that any brand of pigment works. I found that interesting.
>
> --Dick Sullivan
In fact, the only person I know of who teaches that precious nonsense
about brand being all-important is Stephen Livick.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : 08/07/03-03:34:50 PM Z CST