Re: a newbie's first post: gum, temperaprint, oil printing,sizing,and computer negatives
From: Katharine Thayer (kthayer@pacifier.com)
Date: 06/16/03-09:12:57 AM Z
- Next message: Christina Z. Anderson: "Re: a newbie's first post: gum, temperaprint,oil printing,sizing,and computer negatives"
- Previous message: Katharine Thayer: "Re: a newbie's first post: gum, temperaprint, oil printing,sizing,and computer negatives"
- In reply to: Christina Z. Anderson: "Re: a newbie's first post: gum, temperaprint, oil printing,sizing,and computer negatives"
- Next in thread: Judy Seigel: "Re: a newbie's first post: gum, temperaprint, oil printing, sizing,and computer negatives"
Christina Z. Anderson wrote:
>
> When I did the Berger method there, I could coat a paper, dry with a
> blow dryer til dry to the touch in 2 minutes or less, expose, and then coat
> again, dry 2 minutes, expose, and you could whip out a mulitlayered
> registered gum print in an hour. <cut>
> With greater humidity this may be a different proposition.
Chris, as long as you're using a blow dryer, the humidity shouldn't slow
you down very much. Your Montana times for the repeated coatings are
about the same as mine on the damp Northwest coast.
kt
- Next message: Christina Z. Anderson: "Re: a newbie's first post: gum, temperaprint,oil printing,sizing,and computer negatives"
- Previous message: Katharine Thayer: "Re: a newbie's first post: gum, temperaprint, oil printing,sizing,and computer negatives"
- In reply to: Christina Z. Anderson: "Re: a newbie's first post: gum, temperaprint, oil printing,sizing,and computer negatives"
- Next in thread: Judy Seigel: "Re: a newbie's first post: gum, temperaprint, oil printing, sizing,and computer negatives"
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5
: 07/09/03-08:31:13 AM Z CST