Re: Mr. Suzuki's posts

From: SteveS ^lt;sgshiya@redshift.com>
Date: 11/06/03-05:24:00 AM Z
Message-id: <009c01c3a458$7d9db270$1404e4d8@PebbleCreekLane>

I have found Mr. Suzuki has been accurate in pointing out exactly,
completely and total failures of some folks who have posted such drivel.

When I'm in the darkroom, I really don't care. I do what I do.

S
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ryuji Suzuki" <rs@silvergrain.org>
To: <alt-photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca>
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 2:54 PM
Subject: Re: Mr. Suzuki's posts

> From: David Foy <dfoy@marketactics.com>
> Subject: Mr. Suzuki's posts (was RE: old literatures)
> Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 14:49:02 -0700
>
> > For some reason, on which I do not care to speculate, he tends to
> > reply to posts in a manner that appears dismissive and arrogant, as
> > in "You are making EXACTLY the mistake I have warned against," or
> > "Your idea is COMPLETELY illogical," or "You have TOTALLY ignored
> > the kinetics of the reaction" or "You have FAILED to consider..."
>
> This is one example of what I call playing with words. Detaching the
> words from their meaning and contexts and move them around to make a
> new story.
>
> When someone made conclusion based exactly on an argument I previously
> described as a fallacious pitfall in several postings, I just said
> that. As long as that someone clarified his reasoning again, we are
> fine. There is absolutely nothing personal about it. When did this
> become your business?
>
> --
> Ryuji Suzuki
> "Reality has always had too many heads." (Bob Dylan, Cold Irons Bound,
1997)
>
Received on Thu Nov 6 05:24:20 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 12/04/03-05:18:02 PM Z CST