Re: Camera for making daguerreotypes?

From: Jeff Sumner ^lt;jdos2@mindspring.com>
Date: 11/23/03-11:50:47 PM Z
Message-id: <26EC6748-1E42-11D8-BF18-000A957DE356@mindspring.com>

I've a 50's 4x5 with a 180mm lens- it works pretty well.

For the plate holder, I use Graphic Film Pack adapters and use paper
behind the plate to hold it in place.- after I've Iodine'd it. I take
it out before Mercuralizing, if that's what I wanna do.

On Nov 23, 2003, at 3:40 PM, Gregory Popovitch wrote:

> I have started making daguerreotypes recently, using a
> copy stand to make copies of silver prints. These come
> out nicely, But I am itching to make daguerreotypes
> in-camera, and I want to buy a suitable view camera.
>
> However, I'm not sure which way to go. I could try to
> find an old plate camera in good condition? Are some
> models especially desirable as users... for example
> allowing movements and decent bellows extension. Or maybe
> I should get a more recent view camera like the Kodak
> Master View and adapt it to take 6 1/2 x 8 1/2 plate
> holders? Is it possible to use a modern camera like
> an 8x10 sinar? Or should I buy a new plate camera from the
> Star Camera company?
> (http://www.geocities.com/starcameracompany/)
>
> Maybe some fellow practitioners of old processes
> requiring plates (tintypes, wet-plate, etc...) can share
> the camera they are using, and the advantages/problems with it.
> Any insight will be greatly appreciated.
>
> gregory
>
>
Received on Sun Nov 23 23:50:57 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 12/04/03-05:18:03 PM Z CST