Re: coating method

About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

From: Clay Harmon (wcharmon@wt.net)
Date: 09/04/03-11:24:15 AM Z


I'm not sure exactly what you are doing, but every platinum printer I
know (including myself) who has picked up the Richeson 9010 wash brush
has used nothing else after trying it. It is used soaking wet, soaks up
no extra coating solution, and allows extremely even coats to be laid
down on the watercolor paper we use. They make a 4 inch wide brush that
can easily coat sheets of the size you mentioned. check out :
http://www.artxpress.com/commerce/catalog/
spcategory.jsp?category_id=1096&czuid=1062695433602

Good luck

Clay
On Thursday, September 4, 2003, at 12:01 PM, Ryuji Suzuki wrote:

> Hi -
>
> I've tried a few brushes, including Japanese hake, similar brush from
> China (soft, thin, white bristle), and a few cheap foam brushes. So
> far foam brushes produced the best results, but it's easy to leave
> thinly coated areas in streaks. Is there any improvement that can be
> made to foam brushes? (something like wrapping the tip with a cotton
> flannel) Or is there anything better?
>
> I coat large sheets (up to 22x30 inches) so absorbent material that
> can hold some amount of emulsion is desirable. This is silver gelatin
> process. I harden emulsion with glutaraldehyde just prior to coating,
> so the emulsion is very viscous.
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> Ryuji Suzuki
> "Reality has always had too many heads." (Bob Dylan, Cold Irons Bound,
> 1997)
>


About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : 10/01/03-03:08:59 PM Z CST