Re: HP5+ for alternative processes

Terry,

I'm assuming you mean 1 part Pt to 4 parts of Pd, but if you could be a bit
more specific I'd like to duplicate it here.

I'm also assuming the log 2.2 density you stated was not DENSITY RANGE, but
DMax of the negative? That would be much different.

Mark Nelson

In a message dated 4/3/04 8:35:16 AM, LCFSHEEN@aol.com writes:

> In a message dated 03/04/2004 15:20:40 GMT Standard Time, Ender100@aol.com
> writes:
>
>
> What would be your PT/PD mix for a 2.2 negative?
>
> Mark Nelson
>
>
> Mark
>
> 1 : 4
>
> I am not suggesting what people should do.
>
> I am just stating the basic facts.
>
> What people do with that knowledge is their business and none of mine.
>
> M
>

Mark Nelson
Precision Digital Negatives
Received on Sat Apr 3 08:54:43 2004