Re: Re: UV exposure light boxes/Solar plate

From: jpptprnt@verizon.net
Date: 02/07/04-12:17:10 PM Z
Message-id: <20040207181710.GNDE13340.out007.verizon.net@outgoing.verizon.net>

Mark,

In talking with David he said to try and do 1min30sec to 2min screen and see
what happens I may try that next week to much to dothis week end.

Jan
>
> From: Ender100@aol.com
> Date: 2004/02/07 Sat PM 05:54:54 GMT
> To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
> Subject: Re: UV exposure light boxes/Solar plate
>
> Jan,
>
> If I understand correctly, the plate is showing at this point tone up
through
> step 11 with no tone in step 12. Steps 1, 2, and 3 are merged, thus the
> plate is over exposed by at least 1/2 stop?
>
> I understand that printing it is the final proof where you would evaluate
> steps.
>
> Mark Nelson
>
>
> In a message dated 2/7/04 11:37:19 AM, jpptprnt@verizon.net writes:
>
>
> > Mark,
> >
> > The inter-session and I can now  think.  The base exposure
> > was 1 min with a D/Welden screen.  And a 1min.30sec image
> > exposure, 3 to 4min was out.  Post exposure 10 to 15min.
> > Visual is tone starts in 4 and goes to 11 on a Stouffer Graphic
> > Arts scale TP4x5.  I have yet to ink this plate so this may change
> > the values in the final print.
> >
> > Jan Pietrzak
> >
>
>
>
Received on Sat Feb 7 12:17:22 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 03/02/04-11:35:08 AM Z CST