Re: light source for very small prints?

From: Kate Mahoney ^lt;kateb@paradise.net.nz>
Date: 02/09/04-05:19:45 PM Z
Message-id: <008201c3ef63$38ddb300$a426f6d2@yourif5zypd2xn>

Fair enough!
Kate
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eric Maquiling" <eric@maquiling.org>
To: <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 11:58 AM
Subject: Re: light source for very small prints?

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 02/10 12:01, Kate Mahoney wrote:
> > >
> > I must second this point of view - I've had a great deal of success with
>
> I'm all for the technology and it'll probably be in my future (so as
> the 8 ball says it will be).
>
> But I like taking small steps at a time :)
>
> - --
> Eric
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: http://www.maquiling.org/gpg/eric.gpg
>
> iD8DBQFAKBCatccVxzrA35cRAvfUAKCHjpRc6iXnhBWz7SqfPBQDYUHHpwCfWHer
> +sgHa8TbkilwcAFlH07W0qw=
> =mX0L
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
Received on Mon Feb 9 17:24:10 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 03/02/04-11:35:08 AM Z CST