Re: Chrome Alum Gelatin hardener

From: Judy Seigel ^lt;jseigel@panix.com>
Date: 02/11/04-09:23:04 PM Z
Message-id: <Pine.NEB.4.58.0402112204520.8395@panix3.panix.com>

On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, Suzu Sn wrote:

> (Is this a "Good try for a provocative response"?)!!
>
> Dear RYUJI (though Ryuki sounds OK too),
> Are you being rude AND sarcastic or just plain rude?

Ray seems quite good natured, and so perhaps disarming, but as a
general rule, any qualification, modification or god forbid
*contradiction* of a statement by Ryuji is ipso facto "provocative."

Since the purpose of this list is *discussion,* and discussion is
generally more useful than edicts, that is

1. counterproductive
2. inhibiting.
3. unfortunate.

J.
Received on Wed Feb 11 21:23:15 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 03/02/04-11:35:08 AM Z CST