I have to wonder if his downfall was orchestrated by the industry. Might
be, in a short sighted corporate sort of way, handy to have no
recognized expert to dispute corporate claims on longevity, color
fastness, etc. And now that we're all hooked on digital, the companies
no longer have to convince us that it's a good technology; so Wilhelm
has served his purpose, is no longer needed, and is very expensive to boot.
Pam
Ender100@aol.com wrote:
>Thus the reason for the quote marks....
>
>In a message dated 1/3/2004 10:15:53 PM Eastern Standard Time, ap@darkroompro.com writes:
>
>
>
>>>Henry Wilhelm is recognised as "the expert" in this area of image
>>>permanence.
>>>
>>>
>> I think it would be more correct to say that Wilhelm is _a_
>>expert. His conclusions have been called into question on
>>several occassions.
>>
>>
>
>
>
Received on Sun Jan 4 04:32:11 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 02/02/04-09:49:58 AM Z CST