Sandy King wrote:
>
> And I will add one final bit of information, which I think one could
> gather from the article at UnblinkingEye. As far as I can remember
> Sam has printed gum with negatives of a fairly low density range, say
> on the order of 0.95 or even less. The digital negatives that he
> currently makes are of this DR, or perhaps even slightly less. His
> results, from my perspective, are perfectly consistent in terms of
> basic colloid theory with the need to use a weak dichromate
> sensitizer with low contrast negatives.
Yes, certainly, but I can see no connection between this information and
the present discussion.
kt
Received on Wed Jan 14 20:26:30 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 02/02/04-09:49:59 AM Z CST