Ryuji,
Thanks for that clarificaton—I've been stewing over those usages for quite
some time.
Mark Nelson
In a message dated 1/31/04 2:07:36 AM, rs@silvergrain.org writes:
> Ok enough on another piece of useless information that doesn't let you
> do anything new. As long as it is clearly understood that it's a
> misnomer and people know what's right, one can call anything an
> emulsion but that would void the word. I personally think it's
> sensible to avoid incorrect use of emulsion altogether in a small
> attempt to break the chain of nomenclature misuse.
>
Received on Sat Jan 31 02:36:32 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 02/02/04-09:50:00 AM Z CST