----- Original Message -----
From: "Loris Medici" <loris_medici@yahoo.com>
To: <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
Sent: Saturday, July 03, 2004 6:08 PM
Subject: Re: Editioning
> I sell unique prints (BTW, what is the difference
> between a unique print and a monoprint?),
Nothing, it's just a term...
>but I warning the purchaser that
> the prints are unique only for the medium/color + size combination, in
other
> words: I can print the same image in another medium/color and/or size. I
> don't think it's wrong to call this "unique" as soon as the purchaser is
> informed correctly. What do you think?
This indeed is what we refer to as a "monoprint" in the world of
publishing, since it's using a common matrix. It's very noble of you to let
the collector know the heredity of the print.
Also, it is indeed "unique" as in "species" ( or sub-species ), and can be
also termed a monoprint because it is using the same negative/positive
(genus).
Best, Craig Z.
Received on Sat Jul 3 16:30:46 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 08/13/04-09:01:10 AM Z CST