RE: Problem with Ultrafine Clear Film

Eric,
Even next day the ink would lift by simply touching the printed side. I do
not think that I could print that slowly! Perhaps the transparency batch
that I bought was defective, or perhaps inks for 2200 are formulated
differently then 7600.

Marek Matusz

> Then perhaps the thing to do is slow down your printer. It should have a
> setting to allow for slower printing that allows the ink to dry more
> completely before advance. I don't see any trouble with the Ultra chrome
> inks, a 7600 print speed, and roller marks.
>
> Eric Neilsen Photography
> 4101 Commerce Street
> Suite 9
> Dallas, TX 75226
> http://e.neilsen.home.att.net
> http://ericneilsenphotography.com
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: mmatusz@pdq.net [mailto:mmatusz@pdq.net]
>> Sent: Monday, May 31, 2004 4:38 PM
>> To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
>> Subject: RE: Problem with Ultrafine Clear Film
>>
>> Mike,
>> Saw excatly same thing. I thoght I could save a bundle on the
>> transparency. No such luck. Pictorico works great, stick with it. As
>> far
>> as stripes are concerened, it is the rollers in the printer abrading the
>> wet ink. The ink of EPson 2200 stays tacky on this transparency for a
>> long time.
>>
>> Marek Matusz
>> > Hi Mike,
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Looking at the even spacing of the stripes males me think there may be
>> a
>> > defect in the substrate.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Don Bryant
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _____
>> >
>> > From: Mike Klemmer [mailto:mklemmer@comcast.net]
>> > Sent: Saturday, May 29, 2004 11:37 PM
>> > To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
>> > Subject: Problem with Ultrafine Clear Film
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > I printed some test curves onto U.C.F. that I recently purchased,
>> Epson
>> > 2200 printer. I got some weird, splotchy lines on the film. I then
>> > printed
>> > the same image onto paper to make sure it wasn't a printer
>> > problem....everything A-OK there. I printed again on the U.C.F. -
>> same
>> > exact problem.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > You can see a sample of the problem here:
>> > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2400372
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Any thoughts?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Michael Klemmer
>> >
>> >
>
>
Received on Tue Jun 1 09:16:34 2004