RE: Epson 2200 & Digital Negatives

jack says "...it doesn't sound like such a good deal ..."

IF you're using a 2200 (this is what I gather from comments by various
users - I yet have to make a trial myself on a friend's 2200)... BUT,
I'm using a 1160 with Conetech inks and UCF simply "rocks" with these
inks and Pictorico "sucks" with the same inks - I mean when compared to
UCF, not that I can't print with Pictorico negatives; but they just are
much more sensitive to abrasion.

Christina, which printer were you using to print diginegs on UCF?

Regards,
Loris.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: jack reisland [mailto:reislandj001@hawaii.rr.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2004 11:12 AM
> To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
> Subject: Re: Epson 2200 & Digital Negatives
>
>
>
>
> Mike Klemmer wrote:
>
> > I meant that the UCF filled a much needed gap for me price wise -
> > being much more affordable than the Pictorico.
>
> Hmmm... based on your reports, it doesn't sound like such a
> good deal to me.
Received on Wed Jun 2 02:32:48 2004