RE: Gum Tri-Color Yellow

From: Keith Gerling ^lt;Keith@gumphoto.com>
Date: 06/02/04-08:58:55 PM Z
Message-id: <BJEDKGOJJOICHBPEGHIFCEEICMAA.Keith@Gumphoto.com>

No, I've never noticed that. If anything, just the opposite: I've always thought that yellow had a broader range because the lighter-colored pigment in the emulsion tended to block light less than blue and red. But I admit I've never bothered to test that assumption.
  -----Original Message-----
  From: Ender100@aol.com [mailto:Ender100@aol.com]
  Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2004 8:09 PM
  To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
  Subject: Re: Gum Tri-Color Yellow

  Just curious if folks doing full color gum find that yellow prints with a shorter scale—fewer steps on a Stouffer?

  Mark Nelson
  www.precisiondigitalnegatives.com

  In a message dated 6/2/04 8:05:45 PM, tomf2468@pipeline.com writes:

    First question: Yellow layer. The "Process" looking yellow paints are
    giving me a normal DR and clear well. What they don't do is show the
    individual steps well, I get more of a gradient than steps. I settled
    on Rowney's "Permanent Yellow #664" (Quinophthalone Yellow PY138). The
    image looks OK, but Yellow is always the color I have to reprint to get
    the balance right. Is this normal, or am I using a poor paint choice.
Received on Wed Jun 2 20:59:00 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 07/02/04-09:40:13 AM Z CST